Not So Good At Writing Letters? Here Are Some Helpful Tips and Samples
To the FDA: Stress the safety issues and the use of alternatives...
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has repeatedly responded to
correspondence from the public that their job is to test the safety and efficacy
of new drugs. They are not concerned with the moral perspective or with
the spread of disease by those who might refuse vaccines derived from aborted
fetal tissue or embryonic stem cells. Their response has been to refer
people to the CDC. And while the job duties of the FDA may not be to
prevent disease - only to approve drugs to prevent them, they are in a
position to offer alternate solutions to using unethical means of vaccine
production. Vero cell lines and chick embryos are existing cell lines that are
already FDA approved and carry no moral burden. New fetal cell lines such
as PER C6 carry human DNA (the father of the aborted baby was listed as unknown)
and the use of the AD5 vector poses risks for
possible carcinogenics.
To the Department of Health and Human Services: Stress your
religious rights and investment of our tax dollars...
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) oversees the National
Institutes of Health, the CDC and the FDA. They use our tax dollars to
invest in new research for preventing and curing diseases. As Americans
you have the right to demand products are brought to market to protect the
health and safety of your families without violating religious beliefs. In
the event of a bioterrorist attack, vaccines should be made available that do
not violate those rights. Since vaccines are required for admittance to
public schools and day care centers, it is only equitable to provide safe,
effective alternatives in order to prevent the spread of disease.
To the CDC: Stress the need to prevent the spread of disease...
The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) in its response to public protests on
the vaccines simply state that they have nothing whatsoever to do with the
approval of these vaccines and they will inevitably refer you back to the FDA.
Let them know that while we are not opposed to vaccinations, if millions of people refuse to use these vaccines due to
their immoral source, they will have epidemics on their hands. They have
the ability to apply pressure to the pharmaceutical companies investing in fetal
tissue research to produce vaccines to prevent the spread of disease - not to
fatten their wallets.
To the pharmaceutical companies: Stress the fact you will not buy their
products...
The only concern of the pharmaceutical companies is their bottom line.
Why would they invest in products that a large majority of the public is not
going to buy? Let them know you will not only refuse vaccines produced
using cell lines from murdered babies, but you will also boycott their other
products as well.
Click below for sample letters written to:
The FDA The CDC The Dept of HHS
The Pharmaceutical Companies: - Merck - MedImmune - Others
Don't let your letter put you in this situation...written in response to one person's protest (incorrect data from the CDC is underlined)
From the Centers for Disease Control:
"The CDC is not involved with the development of new vaccines. This is an issue for the Food and Drug Administration, and your protest would more appropriately be lodged with them. The agency within FDA that deals with vaccine development is the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), and their website is at http://www.fda.gov/cber/. There is a "contact us" option by which you can send them an e-mail.
For the record, no actual fetal tissue is used in vaccine production, to my knowledge. Some vaccine viruses are grown on so-called "continuous cell line" cultures that may have been originally derived from cells obtained from a legally-aborted fetus in the 1960s. These cell lines have been maintained in the laboratory since then and never require any new human tissue. Incidentally, I hope no one believes that any fetus was ever aborted for the purpose of producing vaccines -- even the tissue used to create these cell lines was taken from fetuses aborted for other reasons.
Regardless of one's beliefs about abortion, trying to persuade people to avoid vaccinating their children because tissue from an aborted fetus was used 40 years ago to initiate continuous cell lines that are used in vaccine production seems counterproductive, as the result could be illness or death for children living today."
Note the correct facts: Click here for more! Even the vaccine inserts state there is residual WI-38 or MRC-5 in the ingredients. And we know that the abortion to produce rubella was specifically done with the intention of creating a vaccine. All part of their propaganda to reassure the public there is nothing wrong with these vaccines!