|
Michael Reagan Sets the Record Straight on Embryonic Stem Cell Research
and the Reagan “Family”
"Those who would trade on Ronald Reagan's legacy should first consider his
own words."
LOS ANGELES, June 24, 2004 (www.LifeSiteNews.com)
Michael Reagan, the son of the
late former U.S. president, has come out criticizing the media for
portraying the Reagan “family” as supportive of embryonic stem cell
research, “when the truth is that two members of the family have been long
time foes of this process of manufacturing human beings – my dad, Ronald
Reagan during his lifetime, and me.” The criticism came in a syndicated
column titled I’m With My Dad on Stem Cell Research.
Michael quotes William Clark, his father’s national security advisor and one
of Ronald Reagan’s closest friends, who wrote an opinion piece in the New
York Times: His “suffering under Alzheimer's disease was tragic, and we
should do everything we can that is ethically proper to help others
afflicted with it. But I have no doubt that he would have urged our nation
to look to adult stem cell research — which has yielded many clinical
successes — and away from the destruction of developing human lives, which
has yielded none. Those who would trade on Ronald Reagan's legacy should
first consider his own words," he added.
Michael Reagan discredits scientists who make exaggerated claims for
embryonic stem cell treatments: “Listen to what Ronald D.G. McKay, a stem
cell researcher at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and
Stroke told the Washington Post: ‘People need a fairy tale,’ he said,
explaining why scientists have allowed society to believe wrongly that
[embryonic] stem cells are likely to effectively treat Alzheimer's disease.
He added ‘Maybe that's unfair, but they need a story line that's relatively
simple to understand.’”
Michael also quotes Washington Post correspondent Rick Weiss who writes that
Alzheimer’s is among the least likely of diseases to benefit from embryonic
stem cell research. He says that “people like Nancy Reagan” believe “a
distortion” that scientists are unwilling to correct. “Why?“ Weiss asks,
rhetorically. “The false story line helps generate public support for the
biotech political agenda,” he answers. Nancy Reagan’s support of embryonic
stem cell research “is the kind of advocacy that researchers have craved for
years, and none wants to slow its momentum.”
A statement by a group of Senators and Republican National Coalition for
Life members adds: “The claim that former President Reagan would have
approved experiments that kill tiny human embryos is an insult to his memory
and a complete distortion of his position of profound respect for the
sanctity of human life from the moment of conception until natural death.
One need only read his 1983 essay, Abortion and the Conscience of the Nation
to know this.”
Michael Reagan concludes with a message to the media: “Next time you write
about the ‘family’ remember both dad and me. It’s our family too.”
|